Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1507

reference
525-tree-1
name
1507
tree-preservation-order

undefined

525-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013734 50.898360)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013663 50.898352,-1.013666 50.898366,-1.013676 50.898379,-1.013692 50.898389,-1.013711 50.898395,-1.013733 50.898398,-1.013755 50.898396,-1.013775 50.898389,-1.013791 50.898380,-1.013801 50.898367,-1.013805 50.898353,-1.013802 50.898339,-1.013792 50.898327,-1.013777 50.898317,-1.013757 50.898310,-1.013735 50.898308,-1.013713 50.898310,-1.013693 50.898316,-1.013677 50.898326,-1.013667 50.898338,-1.013663 50.898352)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL